In the Canadian automobile and automobile manufacturing landscape big and bigger groups of dealerships seem to be seen almost as a threat by auto makers.
Yet when it comes to other side of the coin – did not the marketplace coalesce and have economies of scale even early on in the 1900′s. The example is often given , especially in relation to lost jobs and outsourcing , that isn’t it great that the horse and buggy makers went by the wayside and now we drive around in cars. What would of been the value of keeping those old producers of products not needed around ? It would be a lost waste of resources.
In the same manner it was seen as better that larger more efficient auto making operations emerged . G.M. is an example of a company that merged a good number of somewhat smaller operations into one giant and very powerful monolith – both in procuring raw materials , design and management , manufacturing economies of scale etc etc etc.
Even a college economics professor who uses kitschy Apple computers or perhaps Linux would well admit its better to have such an economic arrangement than have 100′s of small backyard , or small town smaller industrial setups putting out hundreds and even thousands of models. Cars might well not be affordable by the average person being hundreds of thousands of dollars rather than an affordable amount. Parts too , might be hard to procure , a myriad of part types and models with no standardization and be hard to source or have delivery for repairs. Never mind finding proper and experienced service people for your vehicle.
Hence market consolidation of operations to a point where they are big enough to serve the automotive marketplace efficiently and cost effectively is seen as good and to be rewarded.
Hence why is not the same when seen in light of dealerships , dealer networks and large scale auto dealership groups ?
Nepon Auto http://www.neponauto.com





